Strategy
What is a customer journey
What does that mean? How do you map it? What is it used for? We clarify the concept.
Users place high demands on their digital experience and strengthening their customer relationships is more relevant than ever. In this article we dive into the challenges energy companies face when it comes to customer experiences. We take a closer look at some examples and explain how energy companies can strengthen their customer relationships and work more customer-focused by investing in digital solutions.
At Limetta we work daily to strengthen our clients' digital products and services. We make sure to create good user experiences where both the business and the end customer have their needs met with the greatest possible benefit. When electricity prices soared in Sweden at the end of 2021 and the beginning of 2022 we began to consider what energy companies' digital customer journeys actually look like. Here we have summarized our insights from the review.
When the electricity market was deregulated in the mid-nineties there was hope that it would lead to increased competition which in turn would benefit consumers. But in hindsight we see that households did not switch electricity supplier to the extent that had been expected. When investigating why the two main factors were: weak customer relationships and small differences in both price and offerings between the various players. Why switch to something that's the same as what I already have.
We are now in the midst of a new transformative era for energy companies and their relationship with their customers is once again a topical issue. Sweden is to be fossil-free by 2040 which in practice means a society that has the majority of its energy needs met by electricity — electricity that will also be produced by energy sources whose capacity fluctuates over time depending on the availability of wind, water and sun. The difference this time is that political decisions have real consequences for the end consumer in the form of sharp price fluctuations and, in the long term, capacity problems in the power grids. On top of that we currently have geopolitical events that also affect the energy market in the form of an aggressive Russia that uses Europe's dependence on natural gas to exert power in Eastern Europe.
We start by focusing on the customers. That may sound obvious, but for many of the energy companies it is a relatively new insight. Traditionally, energy companies have viewed their customers as passive "metering points" in a grid to which they send a bill every month. This relationship is too weak to withstand many of the challenges the industry faces. Strong customer relationships build trust, and increased trust means greater opportunities to collaborate and drive through changes. Energy companies need to cooperate more with their customers to carry out the transitions required. Customers will need to be involved in producing and storing electricity and be demand-flexible. The user needs to become a co-actor in the grid and not just a metering point that is billed.
In the report "The big challenge" produced by SKI (Swedish Quality Index) in 2019, among other things they looked at consumers' willingness to be part of the transition required for Sweden to switch to fossil-free energy. About one fifth of customers wanted to take part. They were both interested and engaged and were willing to make investments to change their energy use. The majority of them were younger, highly educated men with an interest in technology. At the other end were those who were uninterested — around 25%. They did not understand why they should get involved and had no willingness to invest. The rest fell somewhere in between. By far the strongest motivator to get people involved was money.
So we have, on the one hand, those who are ahead of the industry and want more than the industry can manage and deliver, and on the other hand those who don't care. Energy companies must be able to handle both of these customer groups and everyone in between to succeed in their customer relationships. How are they doing then? Not very well. Customer satisfaction is declining according to SKI's latest measurements, especially when it comes to private customers.
Where do energy companies stand in all this? Our impression is that they are aware they need to strengthen their customer relationships, especially digitally, to cope with the future challenges of the energy market, but that they are struggling to manage the shift to becoming more customer-focused.
Historically, Sweden has one of the world's best energy systems with low environmental impact, stable electricity supply and low prices. As we mentioned at the beginning, some cracks have started to show, but by and large Sweden's energy companies are very good at their core business. And perhaps this has contributed to not working in a customer-focused way to the extent they really should have? If one is to be critical, one could say it is a slow industry with silo thinking and a lack of a culture of taking risks and daring to try new things. If so, they are not alone.
An example of another industry where this is common is the insurance industry. There, traditionally, one has also not been so dependent on building strong relationships with customers. If you compare the energy industry with the insurance industry, you see that they have many similarities when it comes to customer relationships:
As a comparison, you can look at other industries to see what transitions they have gone through regarding contact with customers:
The energy sector is an industry that can contribute to sustainability in a real way. Many other industries struggle with credibility in their efforts to appear sustainable because their conditions for making a practical difference are relatively small. If improvements can be achieved in all three of the areas above and they produce results, then there is every chance of becoming real environmental heroes.
Electricity is a special product because you cannot see it and it is consumed the same moment it is generated. How do you create engagement around a product people take for granted?
To better understand what is needed to solve challenges, it can be useful to look at people's behaviors and attitudes toward different aspects of electricity use. Here you find many interesting insights that the energy industry can use to change and deepen its customer relationships.
Traditionally, a great deal of trust has been placed in information, both from the industry and from authorities. There has been an overreliance on the idea that if we simply inform people about how they can save energy in their homes, they will do it. That hasn't worked particularly well:
In this scenario, as a customer I make an investment decision and then don't need to worry about it anymore — the system takes care of everything for me. I have a heat exchanger that constantly communicates automatically with the energy company and uses data on electricity prices, temperature and consumption patterns to continuously make small optimizations. The people living in the household won't notice anything from one day to the next, but over the course of a year the savings for the household are substantial. From the energy company's perspective, this means there are great opportunities to even out consumption over time and use existing grids more effectively, as well as to bind customers closer by having incorporated them into one's own ecosystem of products and services.
The arena where companies meet their customers is today largely digital and this also applies to energy companies. People are used to and expect that they can manage all aspects of their relationship with a company digitally. Electricity companies also have a digital presence where they can meet their customers, but it is not being fully utilised.
A user who logs in to their customer pages at an average Swedish electricity company can probably see: facts about their installation, their meter reading and electricity usage over time, their invoices and their contracts and prices. Furthermore, they can move or cancel their contract and change their contact details.
Okay, that’s not so bad, right? No, but it’s not particularly exciting for me as a customer either. The interactivity that exists is exclusively passive, i.e. I can look at data but there is no way for me to actively influence it. Given the possibilities available, we think the digital service offering that meets the customer should be a bit richer and more inspiring.
For challengers like Greenley and Tibber this is the core of the business model. They provide smart mobile solutions that create a real-time customer experience. The customer can see their consumption right now and over time and also integrate various solutions into the household in the form of solar panels, charging stations for electric cars, or control systems and sensors for indoor climate, lighting and household electricity.
Tibber and Greenley take no margins on the electricity they sell. Instead they charge a fixed monthly fee for the service and can offer both hardware and services. It’s a radically different way of looking at the customer relationship. The product is not the electricity. It is the same regardless of whom you choose and is bought at spot price on NordPool. The product is packaged functionality, interactivity and information for a modern electricity consumer.
We understand that challenger companies like Greenley and Tibber would not survive entirely on their own. They should rather be seen as remoras hitching a ride on the big whales — the grid owners and energy producers. But they are interesting to look at from a customer perspective, i.e. how they, through their digital services, succeed in attracting customers and growing rapidly. Tibber today has around 200,000 customers in Sweden, Norway and Germany and is valued at 3.3 billion kronor. Greenley has 115,000 downloads of its app and in an interview from July 2021 the company’s CEO Tanmoy Bari says:
Energy companies in Sweden should do exactly this to be prepared for the future: drive loyalty through a superior customer experience. They need to focus as much on services and packaging as on operational reliability and capacity planning. If they fail, others will outflank them and gain market share.